<![CDATA['LAT' Comes Correct About Their Bogus Tupac Story - Defamer Comments]]> <![CDATA['LAT' Comes Correct About Their Bogus Tupac Story - Defamer Comments]]> <![CDATA['LAT' Comes Correct About Their Bogus Tupac Story]]> Journalism, my journalism, what has happened to you? Any first year reporter should know more about checking sources than this Pulitzer Prize winner did. He should be fired, but probably won't be because LAT is probably hoping this flies under the radar of most mainstream readers because it's about hip-hop.

yvonnjanae

]]> <![CDATA['LAT' Comes Correct About Their Bogus Tupac Story]]> The LAT is the thinnest big-city paper out there, it's the paper L.A. doesn't deserve. Easy to pick up, easy to put down; they couldn't get out in front of a major transportation or environmental issue if they spent a week of all-nighters in the office. They loves city hall perks to o much to every upset anyone; easier to write thumbsuckers about the filmic flavor of the week.

MrRewrite

]]> <![CDATA['LAT' Comes Correct About Their Bogus Tupac Story]]> Ha! Web: 1 Print Media: 10,000,000

blackheartededitor

]]> <![CDATA['LAT' Comes Correct About Their Bogus Tupac Story]]> You'd think that a Pulitzer winner would know better than to believe that FBI documents are as true as the word of God.

Cam/ron

]]>