Since film critics' heads began rolling en masse at newspapers and magazines a little over a month ago, the debate over the job's future has ignited deep thoughts from New York to Los Angeles. The discussion turned especially profound this week as a selection of esteemed critics moved on to slapping anyone and anything that would stand still long enough to absorb their blows. Follow the jump for our favorite sallies of critic-on-critic violence:
In the Ebert age of criticism, the Aesthetic of the Hit dominates everything. Behind those panicky articles about critics losing their jobs (what about autoworkers and schoolteachers?), lurks the writers' own fear of falling victim to the same draconian industry rule: Most publishers and editors are only interested in supporting hits in order to reach Hollywood's deep-pocket advertisers. This is what makes traditional criticism seem indefinable and obsolete, leaving web criticism as a ready (but dubious) alternative. ... (Viral criticism isn't real; it's mostly half-baked, overlong term-paper essays by fans who like to think they think.) — Armond White, New York Press
Armond's deeply confused screed makes me glad I quit the Press so that I don't have to attempt to explain to people out of professional courtesy what point he thought he was trying to make. ... His simplistic denunciation of the meaning and impact of Roger Ebert — who has done more to widen the tastes of the moviegoing public and popularize basic cinema literacy than any critic in the history of print — is shameful, and would be so even without the "I wish him well as he recovers" parenthetical. — Matt Zoller Seitz, The House Next Door
I mean, it's really sad that all these film critics are losing their jobs, but I think most film criticism is terrible. And not useful. And frankly, really boring. I read very little of it, and find very little of it to be useful. So it's a shame that my colleagues are losing their jobs, but on the other hand I don't read many of them. ... [New Yorker critic] Anthony Lane is a very witty, very funny writer — and he doesn't know shit about movies. — Nathan Lee, Rotten Tomatoes
How to write film criticism? Stop reading it. — Karina Longworth, Spout Blog
Next week: The aftermath! Join Defamer as we break out the dental records and attempt to identify the latest round of critical casualties beaten, torched and cannibalized beyond recognition. No one under 18 will be admitted.












Comments
Oh god, does this mean the Lyons family curse will finally en--oh, wait, print only.
Balls.
Ever since Crash won an Oscar, I avoid anyone's opinions other than my own.
STV - Prepare for the 10000 word email from David Poland for not including him in your piece.
I stopped reading the opines of these blowhards when The New York Times revealed the moist poignant moment (the two shirts) in Brokeback Mountain, assuming (incorrectly) that everybody had read Annie Proulx's short story. It came off as pinched fingers on their nose regarding "the gay cowboy movie," and thinly-veiled homophobia.
They do more damage than good to movies that should be given a fighting chance, most of whom don't know squat about film history or film theory.
They're like the rich kid in school who always had the latest clothes and electronic devices/toys, etc., and thought it made them cool because of it. Just because you get it first, doesn't mean you have to ruin it for the rest of us.
@TheStarterWife: Oh, man, you're right! I'll get on a revision right away.
Just to update the score.
Internet: 1 billion
Old Media: 0
White is right about internet criticism. But Seitz is right about Roger Ebert! OH MY GAWD, I don't know whose critical opinion to parrot w/r/t criticism!
I read that first article. Does anyone know where Armond White keeps his cereal bowls, so I can piss in them?
I like to think I think. Am I wrong, Mr. Armond White?
Good. This ought to go for music critics as well...they pretty much all read like sour grapes anymore. "Wah, wah, not that what I think will have any effect on anything anyway, wah." Exactly. Buh-bye.
Go by your own opinion. It seems people just like to either trash or altogether praise a movie (like Juno). Your eyes and your interests tell you about the movie. Go to youtube, watch some clips, ask some friends you share similar interests with, than see it for yourself.
Start a discussion:
Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?