Not only does Katherine Heigl lack the sensitivity gene when it comes to her marital bliss, but she's also missing a hefty dose of gaydar. Before her Grey's Anatomy co-star T.R. Knight was sweetly outed by since-fired Isaiah Washington, Katie apparently had a big ol' schoolgirl crush on him during the first season. And in standard Heigl fashion, she simply couldn't comprehend why T.R. wasn't showering her with affection after weeks of batting her lashes and sending out ostentatious signals. As The Sun quotes Katie:
"I was getting nowhere and I was super-confused. I was like, 'Hello? Do I have something hanging out of my nose? Why aren't you paying any attention to me?"
As we know by now, Heigl and Knight have since become the bestest of BFFs, but all that cutesy PDA they whimsically display at events now seems sad. All those kisses and hugs Heigl lavishes upon T.R. are now laced with the taint of unrequited love. Sadder still is how this news indirectly adds to the list of ways in which Katie has emasculated Josh "Call Me Joshua" Kelley. With no gaydar and an overwhelming desire to prove she wears the pants, Josh's manhood is in even graver danger of extinction.
[Photo Credit: Getty]
- KATH'S SHAME AT GAY BLUNDER [The Sun]









Comments
Must be tough to lead the life of a needy bitch.
I had a crush on T.R. Knight, too. I didn't feel bad about it until now. Thanks a lot, Defamer. *pouts*
What a goon.
Love it. We don't even have to try. Thanks, Katie. Your shit just writes itself.
So far you have mocked Sandra Oh, Amy Winehouse and Brooke Shields because you find them ugly. Then you said Sherri Shepherd shamefully overreacted to David Beckham and needs to learn some manners. Now Heigl says something silly and you feel she's being arrogant because she's hot.
Why are so many of your posts about how other women look and whether it makes them shameful cows who should hide their fat/too skinny ugly faces or hot bitches who should be punished for their arrogance? Why are so many of your posts so harshly judgmental of other women?
This is stupid juvenile high-school bullshit.
Why are you making all these rules for how women should look and how they should behave and conduct themselves in public? There's way funnier and more outrageous and interesting stuff going on in Hollywood but Mark and Seth and STV consistently beat you to it because you are so preoccupied with monitoring which woman needs to shut her trap because she is too ugly or too good-looking.
@Crazydogggz: Dude.
The web site's name is DEFAMER.
Get over it.
Sweet. My microwave popcorn should be done just in time for Molly's nuclear response.
Seems to me that KH is one of these people who likes to make jokes at her own expense - "I'm so dominating. Ha ha ha". "I totally flirted with a gay man and I was so shocked he didn't pay my any attention. Ha, ha, ha." This can be charming and can be annoying. But it's a little boorish to turn it against her and say she's a needy bitch just because she says she is. I believe she's trying to be entertaining and that's a good thing. I say.
@Sleepyhead: Save some for me.
@emberglance: I think you're right - she's annoying.
TR doesn't look half as gay as her new hubby.
@heidiho: This site is called the Defamer not 'jealous chicks taking shots at chicks with more'.
@Crazydogggz: @SanFranBetsu: As frequent visitors to the site know, Katherine Heigl has a rep for saying "silly things." They're funny. Who among us isn't jealous of a sky-high blonde with perfect teeth? As long as Heigl continues to make jokes on her behalf, we'll continue to laugh along with her.
@Crazydogggz: Oh please.
Katherine Heigl deserves every bit of ridicule thrown her way.
But Molly, you don't have to be jealous of any broad, no matter how good-looking. You're just as good, if not better than any gorgeous person. You're a great writer, you have a great sense of humor, you're intelligent, you help run one of the most popular blogs on the Internet, you clearly have some technical expertise to help run this blog, you're obviously efficient and hard-working, you sound like an interesting person. And Heigl's looks will fade. And most good-looking broads in Hollywood don't have much else besides their looks. The wonderful attributes you have will last your lifetime. This is why I grump at you focusing on other broads' looks. You're capable of much more than that. You're a great enough and intelligent enough writer to go after more important stuff.
Don't leave the big stories to the dudes. Your analysis is just as funny and astute as theirs. Don't leave the serious stuff to them. Too often, women are enocuraged to only focus on stuff that isn't very technical or serious, and only focus on superficialities as if they're not smart enough or entitled to handle the grown-up stuff.
When did we let the Jezebels in here? (Trixie of course has meta-site celeb status)
@Crazydogggz: Yeah, Jezebel? It's that way. To the east. Go there, stay there. You will be among your kind there.
Sandra Oh, Amy Winehouse and Brooke Shields are currently three of the ugliest women in Hollywood, so it's just good reporting. Heigl seems to be quite ugly on the inside. Divorce prediction: 2008-09.
This post doesn't seem protestable. Just no more comparative ass analysis please.
@Crazydogggz: So wait. If I understand your second post correctly, what you're saying is that you are taking out your frustrations with gender relations in general on Molly? Hmmm... That hardly seems fair.
Putting it in your language: Us guys have been making fun of Katherine Heigl since forever. Shouldn't Molly have that option too? Or ought she only enjoy equality on your terms?
If you are going to stand up for women's equality, I think you might want to avoid the phrase, "good-looking broads"
Yeah...everyone isn't great with the repartee, the chit-chat, the celebrese...they still get to have a life; it doesn't mean she's mean.
Comment on this post
Reply by EmailLogin with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?